Economic Impact of Agriculture
Powder River County
Powder River County is a rural sparsely populated county located in the southeastern portion of the state. Over 77% of land in Powder River County is classified as farm land.
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Median Farm Size (acres) | 2,400 |
| Average Farm Size (acres) | 5,005 |
Source: Census of Agriculture: Table 1: County Summary Highlights: 2017
Farm Revenue
Farm revenue (which includes the market value of products sold, government payments,
and farm-related income) were nearly $69 million while production expenses were $52
million. Government payments were 4.1% of farm revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Farm Cash Income | $16,508,000 |
Source: Census of Agriculture: Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: 2017
Taxation
The market value of all property in Powder River County was approximately $434 million
in 2019. The taxable value assigned by the Montana Department of Revenue was $12
million. Agricultural Property (as defined by Montana Department of Revenue as Class
3 Property) comprised 13% of the county's taxable value.
|
|
|
2014 |
| Market Value of Property | $434,895,744 | $360,436,587 |
| Taxable Value of All Property | $12,680,080 | $9,268,206 |
| Taxable Value ofAgricultural Property | $1,711,142 | $2,047,046 |
| Ag Taxable Value as % of All Property | 13% | 22% |
Source: Montana Dept. of Rev. Montana Taxes by County in2018and Montana Taxes by County in2014
Market Value of Crops and Livestock
After adjusting for inflation, the market value of crops decreased by 36%, while the
market value of livestock increased by 61%, from 1997 to 2017.
Sources: Census of Agriculture: Table 1: County Summary Highlights: 2017 and St. Louis Fed Producer Price Index
Crops and Livestock
Cattle comprised 92% of total crop and livestock sales in 2017.
Source: Census of Agriculture: Table 2: County Summary Highlights: 2017
Farm Size by Acres
The percentage of smaller farms, less than 500 acres, increased from 25% to 27%, while
the percentage of larger farms, 500 acres or more, decreased from 75% to 73% from
2012 to 2017.
|
by Acres |
2017
|
2012
|
||
|
Farms |
% |
Number of
Farms |
% |
|
|
1 to 9
|
6
|
2
|
33
|
10
|
|
10 to 49
|
23
|
7
|
20
|
6
|
|
50 to 179
|
23
|
7
|
8
|
2
|
|
180 to 499
|
36
|
11
|
22
|
7
|
|
500 to 999
|
28
|
9
|
37
|
11
|
|
1,000 or more
|
209
|
64
|
208
|
63
|
|
TOTAL
|
325
|
100
|
328
|
100
|
Farm Size by Sales
The percentage of the smallest farms with less than $100,000 in sales decreased from
52% to 46%, while the percentage of the largest farms with sales of $100,000 or more
increased from 48% to 54% from 2012 to 2017.
|
by Sales |
2017
|
2012
|
||
|
Farms |
% |
Number of
Farms |
% |
|
|
Less than 2,500
|
50
|
15
|
57
|
17
|
|
2,500 to 4,999
|
9
|
3
|
9
|
3
|
|
5,000 to 9,999
|
15
|
5
|
13
|
4
|
|
10,000 to 24,999
|
18
|
6
|
27
|
8
|
|
25,000 to 49,999
|
27
|
8
|
29
|
9
|
|
50,000 to 99,999
|
31
|
10
|
35
|
11
|
|
100,000 or more
|
175
|
54
|
158
|
48
|
|
TOTAL
|
325
|
100
|
328
|
100
|
Source: Census of Agriculture: Table 1: County Summary Highlights: 2017
Tillage and Land Use
The percentage of farms using no till or cover crops increased, while the percentage
of farms using reduced or intensive tillage decreased from 2012 to 2017.
|
|
2017
|
2012
|
||
|
Farms |
% |
Number of
Farms |
% |
|
|
No tillage
|
35
|
11
|
26
|
8
|
|
Reduced tillage
|
17
|
5
|
24
|
7
|
|
Intensive tillage
|
44
|
14
|
86
|
26
|
|
Cover crops
|
21
|
6
|
13
|
4
|
|
TOTAL
|
325
|
|
328
|
|
Producer Profile
The county producer population was slightly younger than the Montana producer population. Thirty-eight percent of county producers were under 55 years of age, while 32% were over 65 years of age. Thirty-four percent of the Montana producer population were under 55, while 36% were over 65 years of age. Sixty percent of producers in the county were males, while 60% of Montana producers were males. Farming was the primary occupation for 71% of county producers, while farming was the primary occupation for 50% of Montana producers.
|
|
County
|
State
|
||
|
Producers |
% |
Number of
Producers |
% |
|
|
Age
|
||||
|
18 -25
|
4
|
1
|
570
|
1
|
|
25 to 34
|
58
|
9
|
3,285
|
7
|
|
35 to 44
|
67
|
10
|
5,179
|
11
|
|
45 to 54
|
113
|
18
|
7,309
|
15
|
|
55 to 64
|
189
|
29
|
13,838
|
29
|
|
65 to 74
|
128
|
20
|
11,469
|
24
|
|
75 and older
|
75
|
12
|
5,587
|
12
|
|
Gender
|
||||
|
Male
|
385
|
60
|
28,563
|
60
|
|
Female
|
256
|
40
|
18,673
|
40
|
|
Primary Occupation
|
||||
|
Yes
|
452
|
71
|
23,847
|
50
|
|
No
|
189
|
29
|
24,314
|
50
|
|
TOTAL PRODUCERS
|
641
|
100
|
48,161
|
100
|
Source: Census of Agriculture: Table 45 Selected Operation and Producer Characteristics
Top Crops by Acre
The top crops were hay and haylage, winter wheat, barley, peas dry edible, and spring
wheat.
Source: Census of Agriculture: Table 1: County Summary Highlights: 2017
Top Livestock
The top livestock were cattle, sheep, poultry (chickens) and hogs.
|
|
|
|
Cattle
|
84,944
|
|
Sheep
|
10,620
|
|
Chicken - Layers
|
538
|
|
Hogs
|
36
|
Source: Census of Agriculture: Tables 11 (Cattle) and 13 (Sheep) and 19 (Poultry)
Employment Impact
Agricultural production employed 518 workers, or 51% of the county’s labor force. According to IMPLAN, economic impact model, 360 of the workers were directly employed in production agriculture. An additional 128 workers were employed in businesses supporting agricultural production, such as feed and fertilizer dealers, and another 30 workers were employed in other related businesses, such as grocery and drugs stores. For every 10 jobs on farms and ranches, 4 additional jobs are generated in the county.
|
|
|
Impact Multipliers |
| County Labor Force | 1,006 | |
| Direct Impact | 360 | |
| Indirect Impact | 128 | 0.36 |
| Induced Impact | 30 | 0.08 |
| Total Impact | 518 | 0.44 |
| Agriculture Share (%) | 51 |
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/#cntyaa and IMPLAN Estimates
Value Added Impacts
Farms and ranches generated $33.6 million of value-added, or 41% of the county’s total
gross domestic product of $81 million in 2017. According to IMPLAN, $24.5 million
was directly contributed by farmers and ranchers. An additional $7.4 million was
generated by businesses supporting agricultural production and $1.7 million was generated
by other related businesses. Each dollar of value-added in agriculture by a farmer
or rancher contributes an additional $0.37 of value-added in other sectors of the
county’s economy.
|
Impact Type |
($1 million) |
Impact Multipliers |
| County GDP* | 81.0 | |
| Direct Impact** | 24.5 | |
| Indirect Impact** | 7.4 | 0.30 |
| Induced Impact** | 1.7 | 0.04 |
| Total Impact** | 33.6 | 0.37 |
| Agriculture Share (%) | 41 |
Sources: * St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, ** IMPLAN Estimates
References
- 2017 Census of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Montana, State and County Data, Volume 1, Geographic Area Series, part 26 https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Montana/mtv1.pdf
- Department of Revenue “Montana Taxes by County in 2014“ https://mtrevenue.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2014-Taxes-by-County.pdf
- Department of Revenue “Montana Taxes by County in 2018” https://mtrevenue.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/2018-Taxes-by-County.pdf
- St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank (2017). Current dollar gross domestic product by county
for Montana, retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?rid=397&
eid=1062609&od=2017-01-01# - St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank (2020). Producer price index for all commodities, St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PPIACO
- Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017), Montana labor force, retrieved from https://bls.gov/lau/#cntyaa
Montana State University Extension is an ADA/EO/AA/Veteran’s Preference
Employer and Provider of Educational Outreach.