December 2017 Stakeholder Listening Sessions
MSU Strategic Planning Initial Prioritization for Potential Areas of Focus:
December 2017
The Springboard International team conducted a series of stakeholder listening sessions from November 27 to December 1, 2017. During each of these sessions, participants were led through a series of brainstorming exercises to identify a list of items that they consider important for MSU’s Strategic Planning Committee to focus on throughout the planning process. Once each list was compiled, participants were given three to six stickers (depending on the size of the group) to identify those items they thought should be given the highest priority. Participants could award their stickers in whatever way they wished (i.e. all stickers could be connected with a single item or split among multiple items).
The table below captures all of the items that were identified as important by each of the groups, along with the number of stickers each item received. Each item is listed exactly as it was recorded and prioritized during the listening sessions. Please note that two of the groups (November 28 Faculty and November 30 Students) decided to change the prioritization exercise in ways that altered the prioritization exercise according to the notes at the bottom of the table.
We welcome your feedback on the items below, as well as any additional thoughts or perspectives that you feel the Strategic Planning Committee should take into consideration.
Stakeholder Sessions
Diversity & Inclusion Task Force
Budget, Outreach and Engagement, Planning, and Research Council
Faculty Senate
Deans
Faculty: November 28, November 29
Staff
Assistant and Associate Deans Council
Students
Department Heads
Community Stakeholders
Student & Academic Programs
Top Items
|
Sticker Totals
|
---|---|
Stewardship of human resources
|
6 |
Diversity/inclusion as part of all we do
(litmus test, similar to how “Is this serving students?” is currently used) |
6
|
Supporting in-state students for needs in the state (e.g. nursing/medical)
|
3
|
Graduation/retention
|
2
|
Land grant mission/agricultural foundation
|
2
|
Affordable housing/work with community (graduation students, too)
|
2
|
Realistic recruitment of students who can succeed and be supported by community
(in-state v. out-of-state) |
1
|
Governance structure… leadership & VOC
|
1
|
Avoid conflicts of interest with large donors
|
-
|
Academic success and student success (tensions between them)
|
-
|
Student-centered/student-focused
|
-
|
Top Items
|
Sticker Totals
|
---|---|
Knowledge Generation |
-
|
Graduate Education Improvement
|
-
|
Undergraduate Education Improvement
|
-
|
Community Outreach Improvement
|
-
|
Top Items
|
Sticker Totals
|
---|---|
Sustainability (social, economic, environmental) |
8 (3)
|
More support for programs and offices to address the needs of a diverse student body
|
8 (2)
|
Respect student voice
|
6 (1)
|
Differentiating among grad and undergrad |
5 (3)
|
Increase efforts to obtain public funding to live land grant mission
|
5 (1)
|
Focus on research experience
|
4 (2)
|
Access (fulfill land grant mission)
|
4 (2)
|
Electronic infrastructure (replace Banner)
|
3 (0)
|
Better graduation rates within 4-5 years
|
3 (0)
|
Growth rates (infrastructure not keeping up)
|
3 (0)
|
Classroom maintenance (improving existing classrooms)
|
3 (0)
|
Integrate infrastructure decisions with Bozeman (coordinate)
|
2 (0)
|
Affordability (living in Bozeman; stipends re: G.A.)
|
2 (0)
|
Finding Montana solutions to Montana problems
|
1 (1)
|
Recognizing faculty and staff for hard work
|
1 (1)
|
Listens to students
|
1 (1)
|
Seamless MSU is not working as promised
|
1 (0)
|
Community outreach
|
1 (0)
|
Focus on rural students (Hilleman scholarships)
|
1 (0)
|
Freshman engagement and retention
|
-
|
Supporting veterans
|
-
|
Resourceful with money
|
-
|
Honors college
|
-
|
Build graduate student class options (fewer dual grad and undergrad classes)
|
-
|
Better internal metrics for student services and academics
|
-
|
Highlight practical learning opportunities
|
-
|
Living space for grad students
|
-
|
Data collection/analysis and transparency
(e.g. around sustainability [e.g. carbon usage]) |
-
|
** The Students & ASMSU group believed that undergraduate and graduate students may have different concerns, and would therefore prioritize different items. We captured this discrepancy by counting the total stickers for each item (undergraduate and graduate student) and then highlighting the number of graduate student stickers for the same items. This is represented in the right-most column as x (y), with x = total votes and y = number of those votes that came from graduate students.
Top Items
|
Sticker Totals
|
---|---|
Focus on critical thinking, civics |
9
|
Faculty and staff pay
(tough to recruit; ‘it’s a mess’; grad students, too; inequity, inversion, and compression) |
7
|
Raise Carnegie status (grad student recruitment, faculty/staff compensation and hiring)
|
3
|
Interdisciplinarity in research and teaching
|
3
|
Student-centered (recruitment, undergrad research and teaching, services, learning)
|
3
|
Land grant mission (we live it out)
|
2
|
Market to voters and taxpayers (What does land grant mean in 21st century?)
|
2
|
Infrastructure (buildings ‘so far behind’; ‘can’t support students we have’; disability
access; Romney)
|
2
|
Build leaders
|
1
|
Hire and retain great and committed faculty and staff
|
1
|
Emphasis on research productivity, education in all disciplines
|
-
|
Research on environmental issues from science, engineering, and humanities
|
-
|
Engagement with community
|
-
|
Diversity of programs
|
-
|
Marketing MSU as a whole
|
-
|
Engaging North American tribes
|
-
|
Metrics of success in STEM programs
|
-
|
Focus on qualitative examination of departments and programs
|
-
|
Instructional quality (class size, student retention, NTT group)
|
-
|
Educate to produce good citizens and not just good technicians
|
-
|
Internationalization
|
-
|
Student assessment plan (no training on it, not a lot of resources)
|
-
|
Adequate support for innovative programs (e.g. teaching for Honors)
|
-
|
Top Items
|
Sticker Totals
|
---|---|
Staff to support infrastructure
|
9
|
Commitment to quality education and research
|
7
|
“Good Morning” and “small town” feeling
|
5
|
Service excellence
|
3
|
Enhance and sustain health/wellbeing of all students/employees
|
3
|
Focus on holistic curriculum; both workforce and global citizens
|
2
|
Commitment to access
|
2
|
Higher expectations for students
|
2
|
Student support services and student success
|
1
|
Advanced technology, communication improvements
|
1
|
Focus on global image (beyond state/region)
|
1
|
New learning spaces (e.g. classroom and library)
|
1
|
Stewardship (avoiding financial waste; environmental)
|
1
|
Problem being siloed—not enough time/energy to collaborate; more support for employees
(support staff)
|
1
|
Commitment to recruitment and success of indigenous peoples of Montana
|
1
|
World class teaching and research faculty because of ability to pursue academic excellence
and lifestyle
|
-
|
Focus on student research
|
-
|
Year of diversity (symposiums)
|
-
|
Engaging students on campus and treating them as part of family before they arrive
|
-
|
Exceptional research and undergrad education
|
-
|
Collaboration across silos
|
-
|
Good student engagement thru programs, student-faculty relationships
|
-
|
Improving connections with Bozeman community, state, region
|
-
|
Enhancing pathways to advancement
|
-
|
Improve infrastructure (physical and technology)
|
-
|
Support for diverse students and students at risk
|
-
|